Everytime I send uplink with DR6 in EU aka: SF7BW250 TTN asks for DR5 aka...
Hello there. Every time I send an uplink in my TTN gateway with DR6 - SF7BW250 - I receive a MAC command with payload 0350FF0001 03 is ADR command. Next byte 50 binary: 01010000 means that the MSB...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Everytime I send uplink with DR6 in EU aka: SF7BW250 TTN asks for DR5 aka...
clv: So DR6 is not welcome in LoRaWAN? Better to use it in special cases? Same goes with FSK? Yes - at least for TTN, yes and yes. AFAIK, the original chipsets couldn’t do DR6 so …
View ArticlenormalizeUplink vs the mandatory schema validation
Again, thanks for your response and perspective on this. I do not yet fully grasp the power dynamics of TTI/TTN or the pulse of this open-source community. Having a discussion here feels like the...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Everytime I send uplink with DR6 in EU aka: SF7BW250 TTN asks for DR5 aka...
Thanks. descartes: AFAIK, the original chipsets couldn’t do DR6 so … The chipsets of concentrators? FSK is five times faster than DR5, so it seems it has some benefits.
View ArticleClik here to view.
normalizeUplink vs the mandatory schema validation
colinsurprenant: My point was about your statement on how things should be done: “real programmers decode on their own platform”, which I assumed to be TTN’s perspective on how I should approach...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Everytime I send uplink with DR6 in EU aka: SF7BW250 TTN asks for DR5 aka...
clv: The chipsets of concentrators? I think it was the radios but Jeff will go in to detail
View ArticleClik here to view.
Everytime I send uplink with DR6 in EU aka: SF7BW250 TTN asks for DR5 aka...
All I knows is that a major vendor said their device supported DR6 which the worlds largest Defence Contractor purchased from me for a pilot project but it turns out the vendor had got it wrong and it...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Everytime I send uplink with DR6 in EU aka: SF7BW250 TTN asks for DR5 aka...
stevencellist: So that has nothing to do with DR6 not being welcome, it’s simply a matter of the ADR algorithm. So, to paraphrase, DR6 is all good but the LNS will never enable it. Is that not the...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Everytime I send uplink with DR6 in EU aka: SF7BW250 TTN asks for DR5 aka...
clv: I think we all agree Not so fast, because I just said I disagree. Here is the Semtech recommended implementation (which, AFAIK, is what TTN and Chirpstack use): it explicitly states that it does...
View ArticleUnstable connection
Thank you so much for your reply! RSSI & SNR I tried sending the signal from home (distance to the nearest gateway is about 200m). I got the following results: First attempt - the device...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Everytime I send uplink with DR6 in EU aka: SF7BW250 TTN asks for DR5 aka...
stevencellist: I think DR6 is welcome. I think it can’t be welcome without having an option to tell the LNS a device is DR6 compatible. AFAIK there is no such option in the current code base and as a...
View ArticlenormalizeUplink vs the mandatory schema validation
Thanks again, Nick. I appreciate the context you’ve shared about TTN, TTI, and the challenges around maintaining the platform, as well as your insight into the practical realities of its operation....
View ArticleUnstable connection
At 200m I’d expect a far higher (or lower, as you brain works) RSSI. Somewhere around -90 which is sort of a guess value, but -114 is definitely in the km range so this isn’t ideal. [Note to self,...
View ArticleClik here to view.
normalizeUplink vs the mandatory schema validation
colinsurprenant: who this “everyone” is that TTN is trying to protect by strictly enforcing the output schema of normalizeUplink() TTN has several default integrations available and some of them...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Everytime I send uplink with DR6 in EU aka: SF7BW250 TTN asks for DR5 aka...
stevencellist: Not so fast, because I just said I disagree I think Bill Murray & Scarlett Johansson may have intervened here. Overall, to me, it seems we understand that however attractive, DR6...
View ArticleClik here to view.
normalizeUplink vs the mandatory schema validation
colinsurprenant: the possibility of more flexibility (e.g., allowing user-defined schemas or bypassing validation) remain unanswered I believe I’ve been clear, post an issue or create a PR on GitHub -...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Everytime I send uplink with DR6 in EU aka: SF7BW250 TTN asks for DR5 aka...
I was slightly advocating for the devil: all Dutch schools are enforced by law to monitor CO2 levels, and as ours are monitored through LW, as a result my boxes suffer a considerable packet loss...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Everytime I send uplink with DR6 in EU aka: SF7BW250 TTN asks for DR5 aka...
stevencellist: I was slightly advocating for the devil At Ichthus College - that’s brave indeed. TBH, I think if it’s become a legal requirement, unless that is a demonstrable harm to student, I’d...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Everytime I send uplink with DR6 in EU aka: SF7BW250 TTN asks for DR5 aka...
I’m not fighting my bosses on their CO2 sensors, I was thinking about having my own boxes use DR6 to avoid losing packets to the CO2 sensors. But I rest my case
View ArticleClik here to view.
normalizeUplink vs the mandatory schema validation
kersing: TTN has several default integrations available and some of them expect data in a certain format. Allowing users to define their own format will impact those integrations. Thanks, @kersing,...
View Article